Narrow your search
Listing 1 - 3 of 3
Sort by

Book
Reading the comments : likers, haters, and manipulators at the bottom of the Web
Author:
ISBN: 0262328879 0262328887 9780262328876 9780262328883 9780262028936 026202893X 0262529882 9780262529884 Year: 2015 Publisher: Cambridge, Massachusetts ; London, England : The MIT Press,

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

"Online comment can be informative or misleading, entertaining or maddening. Haters and manipulators often seem to monopolize the conversation. Some comments are off-topic, or even topic-less. In this book, Joseph Reagle urges us to read the comments. Conversations "on the bottom half of the Internet," he argues, can tell us much about human nature and social behavior. Reagle visits communities of Amazon reviewers, fan fiction authors, online learners, scammers, freethinkers, and mean kids. He shows how comment can inform us (through reviews), improve us (through feedback), manipulate us (through fakery), alienate us (through hate), shape us (through social comparison), and perplex us. He finds pre-Internet historical antecedents of online comment in Michelin stars, professional criticism, and the wisdom of crowds. He discusses the techniques of online fakery (distinguishing makers, fakers, and takers), describes the emotional work of receiving and giving feedback, and examines the culture of trolls and haters, bullying, and misogyny. He considers the way comment--a nonstop stream of social quantification and ranking--affects our self-esteem and well-being. And he examines how comment is puzzling--short and asynchronous, these messages can be slap-dash, confusing, amusing, revealing, and weird, shedding context in their passage through the Internet, prompting readers to comment in turn, "WTF?!?"--Publisher's description.

Keywords

Online chat groups. --- Electronic discussion groups. --- Blogs --- Internet --- Social aspects. --- Blogging --- Web logs --- Weblogs --- Discussion groups, Electronic --- Discussion lists, Electronic --- E-lists (Electronic discussion groups) --- E-mail discussion groups --- Electronic discussion lists --- Electronic forums --- Electronic news groups --- Electronic newsgroups --- Internet discussion groups --- Internet forums --- Internet news groups --- Internet newsgroups --- Lists, Electronic discussion --- LISTSERV lists (Electronic discussion groups) --- News groups, Electronic --- Newsgroups, Electronic --- Online discussion groups --- Online forums --- Online news groups --- Online newsgroups --- Usenet news groups --- Usenet newsgroups --- Chat groups, Online --- Chat rooms, Online --- Chat services, Online --- Chat sites, Online --- Chatboxes, Online --- Chatrooms, Online --- Chats, Online --- Chatsites, Online --- Electronic chat groups --- Internet-based chat sites --- Internet chat groups --- Online chatrooms --- Online chats --- Forums (Discussion and debate) --- Computer bulletin boards --- Online chat groups --- Conversation --- Real-time data processing --- Social media --- Web sites --- Electronic discussion groups --- Diaries --- Citizen journalism --- INFORMATION SCIENCE/Internet Studies --- INFORMATION SCIENCE/Communications & Telecommunications --- SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY/General --- Blogs - Social aspects --- Internet - Social aspects --- online comments --- internet comments --- YouTube comments --- internet trolls --- trolling --- cyberbullying --- Amazon reviews --- online identity --- internet studies --- online communication --- communication studies --- digital culture --- internet identity


Book
Good faith collaboration
Author:
ISBN: 9780262014472 0262014475 0262518201 9786612899294 0262289717 1282899295 9780262289719 9780262518208 9781282899292 Year: 2010 Publisher: Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, is built by a community - a community of Wikipedians who are expected to "assume good faith" when interacting with one another. In Good Faith Collaboration, Joseph Reagle examines this unique collaborative culture. Wikipedia, says Reagle, is not the first effort to create a freely shared, universal encyclopedia; its early twentieth-century ancestors include Paul Otlet's Universal Repository and H.G. Wells's proposal for a World Brain. Both these projects, like Wikipedia, were fuelled by new technology-which at the time included index cards and microfilm. What distinguishes Wikipedia from these and other more recent ventures is Wikipedia's good faith collaborative culture, as seen not only in the writing and editing of articles but also in their discussion pages and edit histories. Keeping an open perspective on both knowledge claims and other contributors, Reagle argues, creates an extraordinary collaborative potential. Wikipedia is famously an encyclopedia "anyone can edit," and Reagle examines Wikipedia's openness and several challenges to it: technical features that limit vandalism to articles; private actions to mitigate potential legal problems; and Wikipedia's own internal bureaucratization. He explores Wikipedia's process of consensus (reviewing a dispute over naming articles on television shows) and examines the way leadership and authority work in an open content community. Wikipedia's style of collaborative production has been imitated, analyzed, and satirized. Despite the social unease over its implications for individual autonomy, institutional authority, and the character (and quality) of cultural products, Wikipedia's good faith collaborative culture has brought us closer than ever to a realization of the century-old pursuit of a universal encyclopedia."--Jacket.


Book
Hacking life : systematized living and its discontents
Author:
ISBN: 9780262038157 0262038153 9780262352031 0262352036 0262352044 Year: 2019 Publisher: Cambridge : MIT Press,

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

Life hacking as self-help for the creative class in the digital age: using systems in pursuit of health, wealth, and productivity. Life hackers track and analyze the food they eat, the hours they sleep, the money they spend, and how they're feeling on any given day. They share tips on the most efficient ways to tie shoelaces and load the dishwasher; they employ a tomato-shaped kitchen timer as a time-management tool.They see everything as a system composed of parts that can be decomposed and recomposed, with algorithmic rules that can be understood, optimized, and subverted. In Hacking Life , Joseph Reagle examines these attempts to systematize living and finds that they are the latest in a long series of self-improvement methods. Life hacking, he writes, is self-help for the digital age's creative class. Reagle chronicles the history of life hacking, from Benjamin Franklin's Poor Richard's Almanack through Stephen Covey's 7 Habits of Highly Effective People and Timothy Ferriss's The 4-Hour Workweek . He describes personal outsourcing, polyphasic sleep, the quantified self movement, and hacks for pickup artists. Life hacks can be useful, useless, and sometimes harmful (for example, if you treat others as cogs in your machine). Life hacks have strengths and weaknesses, which are sometimes like two sides of a coin: being efficient is not the same thing as being effective; being precious about minimalism does not mean you are living life unfettered; and compulsively checking your vital signs is its own sort of illness. With Hacking Life, Reagle sheds light on a question even non-hackers ponder: what does it mean to live a good life in the new millennium.

Listing 1 - 3 of 3
Sort by